The software can see everything.The law asks what you need.
Availability of a tool is not a purpose.
In one line: Section 7(i) allows processing for employment purposes and to safeguard the employer from loss or liability. Monitoring should be necessary and proportionate to those purposes.
Watching is easy. Justifying it is the work.
The scene
The productivity tool captured screenshots every ten minutes, including personal banking tabs and medical appointments booked at lunch. Managers loved the dashboard. Nobody had asked what purpose the screenshots served.
Where the thinking breaks
A proportionality test
What risk does this monitoring address? Is there a less intrusive way? Who sees the output? How long is it kept? Write the answers before switching it on.
Monday morning
- 01List every monitoring tool in use.
- 02Write the purpose each serves.
- 03Switch off features that serve none.
Questions, answered plainly
Is employee monitoring allowed under DPDPA?
Section 7(i) allows processing for employment purposes and to safeguard the employer from loss or liability. Monitoring should be necessary and proportionate to those purposes.
Is employee consent valid for monitoring?
Consent must be free. In an employment relationship that can be difficult to show, so employers should rely on a clearly applicable legitimate use and limit monitoring to it.
Tell us where your data sits.We'll show you where the exposure is.
A partner replies within one working day, with a first view on your penalty exposure.
Speak to a partner