AMLEGALS
Schedule to DPDPA · Section 33

DPDPA Penalty Calculator

Up to ₹250 Crores. Per contravention. Board-determined.

Penalties under DPDPA 2023 are not capped per organisation — they are calculated per contravention, with the Schedule prescribing seven Schedule entries. The Data Protection Board considers seven factors when fixing penalty quantum. This guide maps the entire penalty architecture.

7

Schedule entries

Schedule, DPDPA 2023
7

Statutory assessment factors

Section 33(2)
Up to ₹250 Cr

Highest single contravention

Para 1, Schedule
No cap

On cumulative penalty exposure

Per organisation
How Penalties Work

The penalty is not capped per organisation. It is capped per contravention.

Section 33 of DPDPA 2023 empowers the Data Protection Board of India to impose monetary penalties for contraventions specified in the Schedule. The Schedule prescribes seven Schedule entries of contravention with distinct penalty ceilings.

Crucially, a single breach event can attract penalties under multiple Schedule entries simultaneously — inadequate security safeguards (Para 1), failure to notify (Para 2), and breach of other provisions (Schedule item 7). The Board adjudicates each contravention separately under Section 33.

When the Board determines penalty quantum, it weighs seven statutory factors. Two organisations with identical contraventions can face materially different penalties depending on volume, sensitivity, mitigation, and compliance history.

The Schedule — Seven Entries

Penalty architecture, in descending order of exposure

The Schedule to DPDPA 2023 prescribes seven Schedule entries of contravention, each with its own ceiling. The bars are illustrative ceiling comparisons, not probabilities or predicted fines. Item 6 has no independent fixed amount.

01

Failure to take reasonable security safeguards under Section 8(5)

Schedule item 1
Up to ₹250 Crores
02

Failure to give breach intimation under Section 8(6)

Schedule item 2
Up to ₹200 Crores
03

Breach of children’s obligations under Section 9

Schedule item 3
Up to ₹200 Crores
04

Breach of SDF obligations under Section 10

Schedule item 4
Up to ₹150 Crores
05

Breach of Data Principal duties under Section 15

Schedule item 5
Up to ₹10,000
06

Breach of an accepted voluntary undertaking under Section 32

Schedule item 6
Up to the ceiling applicable to the underlying breach
07

Breach of any other provision of the Act or Rules

Schedule item 7
Up to ₹50 Crores
Section 33(2) — Penalty Determination

The seven factors that move the penalty needle

When the Data Protection Board fixes penalty quantum within the prescribed ceiling, it considers these statutory factors. No statutory weights or fine-prediction formula are provided. This page is a legal reference, not an interactive fine calculation. Principal penalty provisions commence on 13 May 2027.

FACTOR 01Section 33(2)

Nature, gravity and duration of the breach

Section 33(2)(a). The Act does not assign a fixed numerical or High/Medium weight.

FACTOR 02Section 33(2)

Type and nature of the personal data affected

Section 33(2)(b). The Act does not assign a fixed numerical or High/Medium weight.

FACTOR 03Section 33(2)

Repetitive nature of the breach

Section 33(2)(c). The Act does not assign a fixed numerical or High/Medium weight.

FACTOR 04Section 33(2)

Gain realised or loss avoided

Section 33(2)(d). The Act does not assign a fixed numerical or High/Medium weight.

FACTOR 05Section 33(2)

Mitigation: action, timeliness and effectiveness

Section 33(2)(e). The Act does not assign a fixed numerical or High/Medium weight.

FACTOR 06Section 33(2)

Proportionality and effectiveness, including observance and deterrence

Section 33(2)(f). The Act does not assign a fixed numerical or High/Medium weight.

FACTOR 07Section 33(2)

Likely impact of the monetary penalty on the person

Section 33(2)(g). The Act does not assign a fixed numerical or High/Medium weight.

Risk Profile Patterns

Illustrative issues requiring legal assessment

These examples require an applicable duty and evidence of a breach. They are not findings about any organisation or automatic penalty triggers.

No formal breach notification protocol — not documented, not rehearsed

Para 2Up to ₹200 Cr

Bundled consent for multiple processing purposes via single checkbox

Schedule item 7Up to ₹50 Cr

Processing children’s data without verifiable parental consent mechanism

Schedule item 3Up to ₹200 Cr

No India-based Data Protection Officer where the entity has been notified as an SDF

Schedule item 4Up to ₹150 Cr

Inadequate technical security safeguards — no MFA, weak access controls, unencrypted at rest

Para 1Up to ₹250 Cr

No Data Processing Agreements with vendors handling personal data

Schedule item 7Up to ₹50 Cr

No periodic Data Protection Impact Assessments where required

Schedule item 4Up to ₹150 Cr

No mechanism for Data Principals to exercise rights of access and erasure

Schedule item 7Up to ₹50 Cr
Penalty enquiry

Request a Penalty Risk Estimate

Share the contours of your operations and our practitioners will model your maximum statutory exposure across the seven Schedule entries — along with the factors that would materially affect Board-level penalty determination.

Request a Confidential Risk Estimate

Our practitioners will reach out within one working day with an indicative exposure analysis.

Your information is handled in accordance with our privacy obligations. No spam, ever.

Insights & Answers

What practitioners and boards are asking

What are the penalties under DPDPA 2023?

Penalties are listed in the Schedule to the Act and imposed by the Data Protection Board under Section 33. The highest listed maximum is ₹250 crore for failure to take reasonable security safeguards, and up to ₹200 crore for failure to fulfil children's-data obligations, with graded maximums for other contraventions such as breach-notification and Consent Manager failures.

How does the Data Protection Board decide the penalty amount?

Under Section 33, the Board determines the penalty considering the nature, gravity and duration of the contravention, the type and sensitivity of personal data affected, whether the harm was repetitive, any gains or mitigation, and the proportionality of the penalty. Demonstrable, documented compliance is a direct mitigating factor.

Are DPDPA penalties per-violation or capped?

The Schedule sets a maximum for each category of contravention rather than a per-record fine. The amounts are ceilings; the Board sets the actual figure case by case. This makes evidence of a good-faith compliance programme financially material, not merely procedural.